Travel narratives, picaresque novels, and even the new fashion for carriage rides become case studies. How did a woman’s mobility differ from a man’s? What happened when female characters ventured outside the domestic sphere in novels by Aphra Behn or Daniel Defoe? The essays argue that literal movement (or confinement) is a powerful metaphor for social agency.
Casual readers looking for a light overview—though the introduction is highly recommended even for them. Travel narratives, picaresque novels, and even the new
If you’ve ever studied the British long eighteenth century (the era of Restoration drama, Defoe’s castaways, Pope’s satires, and Austen’s drawing rooms), you know that where a scene takes place is rarely just a backdrop. A closet, a coffeehouse, a carriage, a colonial plantation, or a London street—these are not passive settings. They are active forces that shape what characters can do, say, or even think. The essays argue that literal movement (or confinement)
Check your university library, WorldCat, or Routledge’s website. (The 2014 hardcover is expensive, but many chapters are available via academic databases like JSTOR or Project MUSE.) A Final Thought Narain and Gevirtz remind us that for 18th-century Britons—especially women, queer people, and colonial subjects—space was a battleground. To be denied a room, a road, or a voice in Parliament was to be denied existence. Literature, then, became a way of mapping alternative geographies, of claiming symbolic space even when physical space was denied. A closet, a coffeehouse, a carriage, a colonial
In our own era of remote work, gated communities, and debates over public monuments, that lesson feels more urgent than ever.
That idea—that space is gendered, and gender is spatialized—is the driving engine of the 2014 collection , edited by Mona Narain and Karen Gevirtz . Part of the British Literature in Context in the Long Eighteenth Century series, this volume offers a crucial intervention for students and scholars alike. What the Book Argues The central thesis is deceptively simple: Space is never neutral. Narain and Gevirtz bring together essays that examine how shifting definitions of public and private, urban and rural, domestic and foreign, directly influenced—and were influenced by—changing ideas about masculinity, femininity, and sexuality.
