Prima - Facie

The shift in the performance is visceral. The rapid-fire, confident barrister evaporates. In her place is a woman who cannot sleep, who showers three times a day, who Googles “date rape” at 4 a.m. but refuses to call it that. Because Tansy knows the law too well.

Tansy loses her case. But Suzie Miller wins the argument. Prima Facie

Tansy defends men accused of sexual assault. She is proud of this. She argues that she isn’t defending the act, but the principle. She cross-examines complainants with surgical precision, exploiting gaps in memory, intoxication, or the infamous “lack of resistance.” She believes she is a guardian of justice, ensuring the state doesn’t convict an innocent man on flimsy evidence. The shift in the performance is visceral

Tansy loses the case. The jury returns a not-guilty verdict. but refuses to call it that

This is the play’s central genius: She can map out exactly how her own barrister (if she hires one) would dismantle her testimony. She can hear the cross-examination before it happens: “You didn’t say no loudly enough? You continued to lie there? You texted him ‘goodnight’ the next day to be polite?” Part III: The Trial of the Self The final act follows Tansy’s decision to report the crime and take the stand. In a cruel irony, she has to hire a junior barrister to represent her while she watches from the gallery. She watches a woman—her surrogate—try to do what Tansy used to do: fight the machine.

★★★★★ (But only if you have the emotional armour for it)